Category: Green Tech

  • Seven for Saturday: News You Can Use 5/7

    Seven for Saturday: News You Can Use 5/7

    pink flowers

     
    There was actually a whole lot out there this week, once you waded through all the Royal Wedding & Bin Laden headlines. I’ve held some in reserve to flesh out into full posts because I had stuff to say about them, but here are 7 of my favorite links from the past 7 days:

    1. Food Politics: At last FTC releases principles of food marketing to kids.

    Proposed principles on what is allowed to be marketed to your kids are open to comment until May 24, but not scheduled to go into effect until 2016. Principle A states that child-targeted marketing must be applied to foods that contribute to a healthy diet, and contain at least one of specified food groups. On the flip side, Principle B states that the food can not contain more than specified amount of unhealthy elements (trans fats, sugars, etc).

    The problem is this: “The proposed voluntary principles are designed to encourage stronger and more meaningful self-regulation by the food industry and to support parents’ efforts to get their kids to eat healthier foods.”

    Voluntary, self-regulated, and the blame still quietly rests entirely on parents’ shoulders. When are we really going to hold companies accountable for messing with our kids’ heads?

    2. Do video games make kids eat more?

    A (very small) study found that boys consumed more calories over the course of the day (163 on average) when they played video games for an hour rather than just laying around for an hour. Since there was no reported increase in hunger, the theory is that video games may cause a “mental-stress effect” and the food acts to self-soothe.

    163 doesn’t seem like a lot, until you take into account that most kids spend more than an hour interacting with a screen, often snacking at the same time.

    3. How Do We Prepare Kids for Jobs We Can’t Imagine Yet? Teach Imagination

    This is my big thing about traditional schooling: it doesn’t teach you to love learning, or how to learn on your own. Those who went on to think out of the box and become wildly creative & successful, did so in spite of their education, not because of it.

    “When you were a kid, could you, your teachers, or your parents imagine your current job? Plenty of us go to work every day in careers that didn’t exist when we were in grade school. How can schools set the next generation up for success when we don’t have a clear picture of what the jobs of the future will be? The growing consensus is that we need to shift schools toward to fostering creativity and conceptual thinking abilities…

    The question is, how?

    Related topic: a few weeks back I highlighted The Creativity Crisis, which mentioned that NASA and Boeing now look for ideal candidates who have education or experience in “hands-on” fields such music, sculpture, or auto mechanics. The problem, they say, is that “recent graduates can technically render in two dimensions but can no longer think in three.”

    4. Botox: Paralyzing More than Just Your Face

    I’ve seen this discussed before, and I think it’s fascinating. Your brain knows you are happy when you smile broadly, and smiling/happiness is something that is universally recognized across cultures. We also reflexively mirror other people’s smiles when we see them. When you’ve paralyzed your face muscles with toxins, your face can’t perform these actions and therefore your brain neither recognizes other people’s happiness nor registers your own.

    Are happiness and empathy something worth giving up just to erase a few years from your face (only to have them, depressingly, return after it wears off)? I hope I don’t know anyone who answers that question yes.

    5. Your Heart Can Sync With a Loved One’s

    All those love songs are on to something: two hearts can beat as one. Watching a relative or friend walk over hot coals at a fire walking ritual, spectator’s hearts followed similar patterns as the firewalker. This phenomenon did not occur with audience members who were strangers.

    “Anthropologists have long appreciated that ritual binds people together, but it is unclear how this bonding is achieved,” said Sosis, an anthropologist at the University of Connecticut…The discovery that people’s hearts can harmonize solely on visual or auditory information reinforces a law of nature.

    This strikes me as so beautiful for reasons I cannot quite articulate.

    6. Jaguar to Build C-X75 Hybrid Supercar

    • jaguar electric carMixes internal combustion power with electric motors to achieve supercar performance and less than 99g/km CO2 emissions
    • 0-60mph in less than 3 seconds
    • 0-100mph in less than 6 seconds
    • Top speed in excess of 200mph
    • All-electric running range in excess of 50km
    • only 250 will be built
    • will cost between 700,000- 900,00 British pounds, which is a kind way of saying over a million American dollars
    • undeniably, toe-curlingly sexy. Makes my old object of vehicular lust— the Fiskar Karma— seem like sloppy seconds and surprisingly affordable at a mere 80K.

    jaguar electric hybrid

    7. Bill Murray As FDR: Star Signs On For ‘Hyde Park On The Hudson’

    I love Bill Murray. I love FDR. That is all.

     

    VIDEO:

    Thinking about seeing the movie Thor? Better watch this first:
     

     

    Your turn! What good stuff did you read this week?

    —————————————————————-
     

  • Nissan Leaf Commercial- Nicely Done

    I think mostly it’s preaching to the choir- it’s not going to sway those who wouldn’t be inclined to buy it anyway, they’ll just call us bearhuggers instead of treehuggers- but it’s very cute.

    What do you think?

    I hadn’t been watching the Leaf too closely but I’ll add it to the list of cars to research as a replacement for ye olde minivan. From what I understand this is the car that could take electric mainstream.

    GRATUITOUS POLAR BEAR SHOTS!! Just ’cause I have them and I don’t know when I’ll get another chance to work them in…

    polar bear wrinkling nose

    polar bear sticking out tongue

  • Switching Allegiance: This is Probably the Most Ridiculous Blog Post I Have Ever Written

    2009 Tesla Roadster

    Take most people, they’re crazy about cars.  They worry if they get a little scratch on them, and they’re always talking about how many miles they get to a gallon, and if they get a brand-new car already they start thinking about trading it in for one that’s even newer.  I don’t even like old cars.  I mean they don’t even interest me.  I’d rather have a goddam horse.  A horse is at least human, for God’s sake.

    ~J.D. Salinger,
    Catcher in the Rye

    OK. So way back in September of ’08, I expressed my undying love of the sexy sexy Tesla Roadster (above), an all-electric vehicle selling for the bargain price of $109,000.

    Actually, in my own defense, I got a little huffy at first about how making such an astronomically priced vehicle just reinforces the notion that being “green” is only for the rich and frivolous. But… people like to have nice cars, right? Fast as blazes? We need eco-friendly status symbols too, I guess.

    Only now, I’ve seen pics of the newest model of the Roadster, and I am way less impressed with the sexy sexy.

    Tesla Roadster 2011

    Yuck, right? It looks like any other middle-aged crisis. I’m not spending my hard-earned pretend money on that thing.

    In a way, I’m relieved– I’m free to spend that imaginary $109K in other places now.

    First I checked out the “normal folk” Tesla vehicle, the Model S:

    I don’t hate it. I’m not crazy about the $49,900 price tag (after federal credits), but we’re looking at 300 miles to the charge AND it seats five adults and 2 children (where?) AND Tesla claims it can fit “a surfboard, a 50-inch flat-panel TV and a mountain bike all at once.” That is impressive. 5.6 seconds to 60mph sounds good, but I don’t actually have any clue how that stands in relation to any other car than the Roadster (3.7 seconds). (I looked it up. My husband’s car- a sporty 2000 Subaru Impreza- had a 0 to 60 of 4.7 seconds when it was new. So, about sports car range. A brand new Corvette, 3.7 seconds. The Roadster looking pretty killer on this spec.)

    However, the Model S’s future is shrouded in mystery: not yet in production (slated to begin in 2012 but no factory has been secured, I don’t think), and Tesla’s finances look unsteady. I don’t know. I just don’t feel confident about this car right now.

    Meanwhile, the Boxwood plant (formerly GM) a few minutes away from us has been purchased by Fisker, another electric car company. The Fisker Karma went on tour a while ago and my brother obligingly went into Wilmington to take a few pictures for me and give his professional opinion (he’s a car person).

    Fisker Karma

    There’s the official, media-ready photo, and it’s looking pretty sexy sexy itself.

    Here’s the in-person, no-makeup-on, my-brother-is-not-a-professional-photographer photo, and it STILL looks tasty.

    fisker karma in Wilmington DE

    The interior looks to me like it was designed to appeal to a snobby older man with aspirations to be of British (or possibly Italian?) descent, and of course that’s probably the case. Why are only minivans and sensible cars marketed and outfitted with the discerning mom in mind?

    My brother, the professional car person, said that it was a good-looking luxury vehicle and looked right at home with all the Jaguars. At $88,000 dollars, I guess that’s the way I’m supposed to be looking at this: an eco-alternative to the Jaguar (also a car of lust-inducing proportions). Ah, yes. On the Fisker website it does indeed state that the Karma will “offer a responsible alternative to those in the market for traditional full size, fully equipped luxury cars.” Gotcha.

    Fisker is also planning an “electric for the masses” sedan called the Nina (yuck) to go into production in 2012. They DO have a production plant in place, and it will be employing people in my area who have lost their jobs due to all the automotive downsizing that’s been happening around here. Hopefully, many of my brother’s friends and co-workers who have been displaced.

    The Nina is another mystery car, all I know about it is a sticker price of $47K. After federal tax credits, if they’re still being handed out in 2012, we’re talking $40K, right? And then gas savings over the life of the car. Not horrific.

    So, in the spirit of “buying local” I’m going to spend my imaginary $109K that I didn’t spend on the Roadster on the Karma, and use the surplus monies to change the interior to something that doesn’t scream “I’d rather be golfing.”

    And I’ll keep an eye on the Nina as a possibility for spending my real money on, when Jake turns 16 and inherits my minivan and I get to indulge my inner car whore. The greenest option, I believe, is to keep on driving what you’ve got until you can afford an ecologically sound replacement. Trust me, Jake will drive that minivan until he goes to college, and then Maverick will get it, and Mav is so tight with his money that he will drive it until it falls apart at the seams. And me? I started driving at age 25. I’ve always driven a mom-mobile. I look forward to owning something that I can feel a little guilty about.

    I know that there’s a Chevy Volt in the works, too– from what I understand that car is being sold less on its sexy sexiness and more on its practical money-savingness and eco-friendliness. Which is sexy in its own way, but will be covered in its own blog post. Because I’ve decided that I find it entertaining to talk about cars, a subject I know absolutely nothing about.

    In other news, Jeff wants to buy a late 70s model Corvette and my protestations are feeble at best. I sort of want one too.

    I can’t help it. I like a sexy sexy car. I like long lean lines. We’re allowed to spend our funny money however we want. Thankfully, I’ve got this eco-thing happening to keep me in check. Ha. That, and a lack of real-life money.

    What’s your dream car… what’s your “not out of the realm of possibility” car?